214.363.2400
wwh@hofheinzlaw.com
Dallas, Texas
Home
Online Services
Practice & Fees
Firm Members
Publications
Contact Us
Contents
Privacy &
Confidentiality
Board Certified, Estate Planning and Probate Law - Texas Board of Legal Specialization
Av Preeminent rated, Martindale Hubbell
Closing a business operation can be simple or complex. Some relevant factors include the type of business activity conducted, the scope of the business activity, whether other business activities of the entity are to be continued, and by the number, type, and disposition of employees. This article outlines the considerations generally relevant to the orderly process of discontinuing a business.
Since government in the U.S. is a federal system, the law of each state in which business is conducted as well as applicable federal law must be considered.
All legally operative agreements should be ascertained and reviewed. Such agreements might include governing instruments for the operating business entity such as corporate minutes or partnership agreements, leases, contracts as either a vendor or purchaser, notes and other financing documents, and employment agreements. If obligations are imposed which continue past the time of proposed termination of business activity, early termination provisions (if any) should be examined carefully to ascertain their precise requirements, and plans should be made and implemented to satisfy those requirements. If no unilateral early termination is permissible, plans should be made and implemented to satisfy the obligation, or a negotiated early termination investigated. It is frequently possible to negotiate an early termination of an obligation at much less cost that a simple breach of the obligation. When such a negotiation is successful, it is important to reduce the agreement to a writing signed by each party.
Business requirements and legal requirements each impose time constraints. It is preferable to commence the legal actions advisable in discontinuing activity as soon as possible after a preliminary decision has been made. The initial review of operative agreements will indicate whether notices must be given or other actions taken, and the period which must elapse before those actions become effective. Typically it is wise to allow no less than six months for analysis, planning, and implementation.
It is important that all required notices be communicated in writing, and that evidence be preserved that the notice was received. The most common means of accomplishing this is to mail each notice by certified mail, return receipt requested. When the return receipt is received by the sender, it should be attached to a photocopy of the notice delivered and be retained with the other permanent records of the sender.
Since some claims against the business may not become known
until after operations cease, appropriate arrangements should
be made to preserve the ability to respond when such claims are
asserted. Although the limitation period for the assertion of
claims varies both by jurisdiction and by type of claim, plans
should be made which allow notice for at least four years after
the termination of activity.
It is important to maintain an agent for contact and service of
process. Without such a designated agent, those previously conducting
the business may not receive actual notice of the asserted claim
and have the opportunity to dispute its validity. If undisputed,
the claimant may be able to obtain a judgment enforceable against
those previously operating the business. Legal counsel may be
retained to serve in this capacity, or other commercial services
are available.
In all cases except a sole proprietorship, a decision must
be made whether to terminate the existence of the legal entity
conducting the business, as well as ceasing operations. In general,
it is preferable from a legal perspective to continue the existence
of a business entity, particularly where the entity was originally
chosen in order to limit the personal liability of owners. While
in general the liability of owners after dissolution is limited
to the assets received on dissolution, proving the assets and
their value may be difficult should a claim be asserted following
dissolution.
Defending claims following dissolution may also be more difficult
as a practical matter, since each distributee on dissolution (the
former shareholders) will usually be joined in any suit, requiring
a defense not only of the entity, but potentially of multiple
interest owners.
Termination of an entity may also have adverse federal income
tax consequences. For example, a corporation which own appreciated
real property may cause the recognition of gain to the corporate
owners on dissolution, even if the property is not sold. Thus
the income tax consequence of termination should be analyzed carefully
and considered when making a decision regarding continuation or
dissolution.
Where the choice is made to discontinue existence of an entity,
appropriate formal action, such as filing articles of dissolution
in the jurisdiction in which the entity was created, should be
taken to preclude the accrual of additional taxes and other filing
requirements. Appropriate arrangements should be made for the
maintenance and safekeeping of the legal and accounting records
of the entity.
Arrangements should be made for the sale or management or real
property. Since real estate sales transactions are generally governed
by state law, care should be taken to conform to the requirements
of the jurisdiction in which the property is located. Typically,
a written agreement is required before either party is bound by
an agreement related to a sale of real property, including representation
by a real estate agent. Once such a written agreement is entered
into, however, it is binding upon the parties and may not be unilaterally
changed. The contract-whether for sale, lease, or management-is
the most important part of the transaction, since generally all
other actions to be taken are governed by the contract and may
not be renegotiated or changed except by agreement. It is therefore
essential in all but the simplest transactions to have legal counsel
before the contract is signed. A real estate contract must never
be considered a memorandum of intent (unless specifically agreed
in writing to not be binding), but should reflect the final and
considered agreement of the parties.
Care should be taken in the selection of a real estate agent,
since different agents specialize in different types of property.
Sales commissions for real estate agents are generally negotiable,
as is the term of representation. Inquiry should be made into
the nature of the sales effort to be made by the agent.
If the use of leased property is to be discontinued at the end
of a lease term, the lease should be reviewed to determine the
requirements for and on termination, if any. All requirements
should be meticulously met to assure that no continued liability
will arise under the lease.
If discontinuance of the business is not at the end of the lease
term, some arrangement must be made to make rental payments, to
terminate the lease by agreement, or to minimize the cost of the
leased premises. Often landlords will negotiate early termination
where the lessee has no or minimal assets which could be reached
in a collection action, or will negotiate some other compromise
of the full amount due under the lease. Most commercial leases
prohibit assignment or subleasing of the leased property without
the consent of the landlord. In general, however, such consent
cannot be unreasonably withheld, even in the absence of such an
express provision in the lease.
Legal counsel can be of great benefit in the resolution of the
problems associated with the disposition or termination of use
of real estate, and should be involved before problems arise.
While generally the employer-employee relationship will be
governed primarily by the agreement between the parties, whether
written or oral, jurisdictions vary greatly regarding the protection
afforded employees on termination. The personnel policy and procedure
manual of the organization and local law should be carefully reviewed
to assure that the employment relationship is "at will,"
and if not, that all requirements for termination are adhered
to strictly. Care should be taken to implement the termination
of employees in a non-discriminatory manner. Notice should be
given uniformly by class of employee. While the amount of prior
notice is a business decision, from a legal perspective a longer
notice period minimizes the likelihood of termination related
claims.
Retirement and other employee benefit plans must be terminated
or provision made for continuation in accord with federal law
or substantial penalties may be incurred.
When insolvency occurs, the law provides relief from the claims
of creditors under the bankruptcy code. Two types of proceedings
are generally applicable to business activities: Chapter 7 and
Chapter 11.
Chapter 7 allows the debtor to liquidate all non-exempt assets
(which vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction) and have those
assets applied toward the obligations of the debtor. Some transfers
of assets made during the period immediately prior to the bankruptcy
may be set aside and brought back into the pool of assets available
for the satisfaction of creditors. Upon completion of a Chapter
7 bankruptcy proceeding, all obligations other than certain types
of claims are discharged, and may no longer be enforced. Generally,
non-dischargeable obligations are certain taxes including payroll
taxes and claims based on intentional torts such as a fraud.
Chapter 11 allows a debtor which appears to potentially be a viable
business to consolidate all claims into one proceeding in Bankruptcy
Court, during which a plan of reorganization is formulated for
the compromise or payment of claims. Such a plan may allow the
debtor to avoid on-going obligations under contracts and other
agreements, such as leases and collective bargaining agreements.
During the pendency of the proceeding and plan as confirmed by
the court, no independent enforcement actions may be taken by
creditors.